Sultan Qaboos University
College of Education
Instructional & Learning Technology Department
TECH4102: Evaluation in Educational Technology/Spring 2009

Khadeejah & Amal Portfolio

Students Names & IDs:

Amal Al-Balushi(66755 ) Khadeejah AL-Shidhani(61344)

Course instructor:

Dr. Alaa Sadiq alaasadik@squ.edu.om

Thank you for taking the time to view our portfolio. This portfolio is about a collection of works that results from our efforts and search in the course of Evaluation in Educational Technology (TECH4102). These works have enriched our experience and background in the field of Educational Technology.

You can view our work by simply clicking on the links from the right side menue:

Wednesday 6 May 2009

Educational Wikis: Features & Selection Criteria



Authors:
Linda Schwartz, Sharon Clark, Mary Cossarin, & Jim Rudolph


Study Purpose
:

Evaluating wikis is very different from evaluating vendor supplied or proprietary programs which have a fixed set of features. All wikis can potentially adopt all of the features found in other wikis, simply by accessing and customizing the source code. This report describes the basic characteristics and features of wikis and attempts to provide an easy approach to selecting wiki features.
There is a comparison between WikiWiki Web (the first wiki) and Seed Wiki (a WYSIWYG wiki). Feature categories included: source code, wiki management, page formatting, access control, communications, support, and advanced features.


Features of Wikis:
• Editable by major browsers (IE, Netscape);
• WYSIWYG editing;
• HTML support;
• text editing (italics, font size, color);
• image insertion;
• hyperlink insertion;
• tables;
• lists (numbered, bulleted, hierarchical);
• media insertion (streaming audio/video);
• search;
• spell-check;
• emoticons;
• blogging;
• polling;
• calendar;
• RSS;
• link checking;
• drawing tools;
• equation editor; and
• Synchronous text messaging.


Further Educational Considerations:
Features rarely incorporated in wikis are: equation editor, synchronous text messaging, link checking, and drawing whiteboard (some do have drawing tools). If coursework requires these capabilities s, an integrated collaborative software program may be a better choice


Reference
:

http://cde.athabascau.ca/softeval/reports/R270311.pdf

No comments:

Post a Comment